User talk:Mathiasrex

Image:Wincenty Kadłubek.png[edit]

Deutsch ∙ čeština ∙ català ∙ English ∙ español ∙ sicilianu ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ українська ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ slovenščina ∙ polski ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ 日本語 ∙ slovenčina ∙ فارسی ∙ македонски ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ русский ∙ հայերեն ∙ suomi ∙ Nederlands ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ עברית ∙ italiano ∙ português ∙ +/−

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 14:30, 20 September 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image Tagging Image:FWIII.jpg[edit]

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:FWIII.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. shizhao (talk) 05:28, 11 October 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Szablon[edit]

Polskim odpowiednikiem tamtych szablonów jest Template:PD-Polishsymbol; odnosi się jednak tylko do tego, co napisano, czyli właściwie tylko ustawy, pisma urzędowe, pieczęcie, herby etc. Prawdopodobnie żadne państwo europejski nie rozciąga podobnego wyjątku tak szeroko jak rząd federalny USA. Nie bardzo rozumiem, w jaki sposób jednak polskie prawo mogłoby się odnosić do zdjęć z amerykańskich archiwów: tam należałoby raczej szukać odpowiednich regulacji prawnych. Wygląda na to, że ta biblioteka nowojorska nie podlega rządowi federalnemu, ani też zdjęcia które udostępnia nie zostały wytworzone przez odpowiednią agencję rządową: nie widzę możliwości w jaki sposób uzasadnić ich umieszczenie na Commons ani jaki dobrać szablon. A.J. (talk) 12:02, 5 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Zdjęcie Donalda Tuska było zamieszczone na podstawie zgody umieszczonej na stronach Sejmu. Przeczytaj dokładnie szablon i jego dyskusję: w pewnym momencie dodano słowo "niekomercyjne" i nowych zdjęc ze strony sejmu ładować do Commons nie można. Zdjęcia ze stron Senatu i Prezydenta są dostępne na licencji GFDL w ramach odrębnie wyrażonej zgody. Sprawdziłem też, że witryna Rady Ministrów ma podobne ograniczenia (czyli tylko cele niekomercyjne) jak Sejm. Nie ma żadnego ogólnego przepisu na dostępność "materiałów rządowych" inne niż te bezpośrednio wymienione w ustawie; nawet jeśli odbitki są czy były kiedyś własnością polskiego rządu, to fotografie jako dzieło pozostają w sensie praw autorskich własnością fotografa. Co do jednego się zgadzam: archiwa, biblioteki i tym podobne instytucje często zawłaszczają sobie prawem kaduka kontrolę z zakresu majątkowych praw autorskich nad materiałami będącymi w ich posiadaniu; polskie instytucje, nawet te finansowane ze środków publicznych, nie są w tym lepsze (np. Narodowe Archiwum Cyfrowe). Nic na to jednak nie poradzimy bez solidnych podstaw prawnych. Jeśli np. autor zdjęcia jest znany i umarł ponad 70 lat temu, to można sobie, mówiąc niegrzecznie, bimbać na wszystkie znaczki (c) "warunki wykorzystania", "legal disclaimers" itp. które anglojęzyczni wikimedianie określają jako "copyfraud". A.J. (talk) 13:21, 5 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please link images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello Mathiasrex!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 17:36, 7 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:Russian soldiers from 1827.PNG is uncategorized since 6 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 17:36, 7 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:JHDąbrowski 1.JPG is uncategorized since 16 March 2009. BotMultichillT 06:08, 17 March 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Image:Interrex.PNG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Księstwo Łowickie 1829.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Maciej Łubieński.PNG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Edward Raczyński.PNG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Blessed Vitus of Lithuania.PNG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:JanTarnowski.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Bernhard von Prittwitz.PNG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Czesław Kaczmarek.PNG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:PolishRuswar 1792.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Krzyż 1794.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Czernihowskie.JPG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Ignacy Potocki.PNG was uncategorized on 5 May 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:51, 6 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image Tagging Image:AnnaVasa.jpg[edit]

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:AnnaVasa.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. O sama K 20:11, 7 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Zdjęcia[edit]

Już kiedyś dość ostro się spieraliśmy o zdjęcia w formacie PNG i swojego zdania nie zmieniłem :) Czy obrabiasz je chociaż na podstawie formatu RAW? Wtedy by miało jakiś sens; chociaż użytkownik nawet dobrego łącza prędzej znudzi się ładując te kilkanaście MB w pełnej rozdzielczości niż będzie miał szanse podziwiać nieskompresowany obraz w jego pełnej krasie, który minimalnie się może różnić od skompresowanego na 95% JPEG-a...

Tyle mojego narzekania; co do meritum: nie ma żadnych podstaw, żeby Twoje zdjecie nie mogło się znaleźć w jakimś artykule zamiast obecnego, nawet jeśli tamto jest wyróżnione przez bota, czy nawet przez projekty Quality Image, Featured Picture etc. Ogólna "fajność" zdjęcia a jego przydatność do artykułu encyklopedycznego nie muszą być zbieżne i na pewno nie ma obowiązku używania akurat tej a nie innej grafiki - w przypadku konfliktu z wikipedystami stosuje się takie same metody jego rozwiązania (czyli w ideale: dyskusję prowadzącą do konsensusu).

Pozdrawiam! A.J. (talk) 13:31, 11 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Aha, a co do działania bota -- tutaj polecam bezpośredni kontakt z jego operatorem. A.J. (talk) 13:32, 11 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jeszcze jedno: ten bot automatyzuje pewne działania związane z projektem Commons:Quality images, ale bynajmniej sam nie ocenia zdjęć automatycznie! Wyróżnienie QI jest przyznawane przez użytkownika; jeśli uważasz, że zdjęcie nie spełnia wymogów projektu QI, można je zgłosić do zdjęcia szablonu. A.J. (talk) 13:42, 11 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Usunięta zawartość[edit]

Witaj Mathiasrex.

Poniższy plik, który przesłałeś nie jest wolny i dlatego musiał być skasowany:

File:Maciej Kuroń.PNG

Wikimedia Commons (czyli ten serwis) może zawierać jedynie pliki multimedialne, które mogą być użyte w dowolnym celu, wliczając:

dołączenie do dowolnej pracy, bez względu na jej zawartość
użytek komercyjny
nieograniczoną dystrybucję
tworzenie prac bazujących na danym pliku

Zobacz stronę Commons:Licensing traktującą o polityce prawa autorskich projektu Wikimedia Commons. Zwróć uwagę, że niektóre projekty Wikimedia stosują inną politykę. Na przykład angielska Wikipedia zezwala na przesyłanie dźwięków i fotografii jako fair use. Na Wikimedia Commons tak nie jest - materiały "fair use" są zabronione.

Proszę zwróć uwagę na to, by przesyłać jedynie pliki które stworzysz samodzielnie, bądź takie które nie są objęte prawem autorskim, bądź takie co do których masz pozwolenie na użycie w zakresie podanym powyżej. Proszę przeczytaj stronę Commons:Licensing, albo przynajmniej Commons:Pierwsze kroki/Wybieranie licencji, które pomogą Ci zrozumieć jak działa Wikimedia Commons. Dziękuję za Twój wkład w rozwój tego projektu i jeśli masz jakieś dodatkowe pytania, to proszę prześlij mi wiadomość. Herr Kriss (talk) 15:30, 26 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Podpis wyszedl spod jego reki, ma pewne cechy utworu, wiec obejmuje go prawo autorskie. To, ze dostal go Twoj ociec, sasiad, czy kominiarz, nie ma nic do rzeczy. Herr Kriss (talk) 20:05, 27 December 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, Image:Wincenty Aleksander Gosiewski.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jodo (talk) 23:28, 26 January 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in 1648.PNG[edit]

Co to jest: "Pionek opolsko-raciborski"? :) Bo en:pawn znaczy pionek. Księstwo to jest en:Duchy. Lenno to jest en:fief. A dlaczego wogóle to księstwo jest na mapce wyszczególnione? Pozdr, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 17:38, 5 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Iwiki od pl:Zastaw na en wiki to en:Lien... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 17:36, 6 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nice map but in 1629 the Swedish-Polish Truce of Altmark ceded Livonia to Sweden. Date on map is inaccurate. Sweden occupied Livonia in 1625. Better change date on map to 1620.

Herby...[edit]

Witaj. Wybacz ale chyba się tego nie podejmę a przynajmniej nie teraz. Mam problemy ze zdrowiem, jestem po bardzo poważnej operacji i siedzenie w tej chwili nie wchodzi w grę. Może później... Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 21:13, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Herb Rzeczypospolitej[edit]

Witaj, z opóźnieniem odpowiadam, bom z opóźnieniem dostał powiadomienie o wpisie, a nie zaględam codziennie na commons. Herb emigracyjny, widzę ładnie zrobiony, a co do herbu Rzplitej to imho nie jest to wielki błąd. Zasadniczo herb mały w minimalistycznej wersji może być przedstawiony jako sama tarcza, bez korony i dalszych insygniów. Chyba najistotniejszy jest tu usus, wydaje mi się. że widziałem monety Zygmunta Starego z samą tarczą na rewersie, bez korony, ale trzeba by dokładnie popatrzeć. Jeżeli była tak oszczędna wersja stosowana historycznie, to może i na Wiki pozostać, jeżeli nie to trzeba koronę dorobić. Nie mam pod ręką Bielkiego na którego powołuje się autor, czy tam jest sama tarcza, czy tarcza ukoronowana? Pozdrawiam, --Steifer (talk) 08:43, 16 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Signatures[edit]

Should be in Category:Signatures as well :) Could you update the categories on the ones you've uploaded? Thanks. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 19:50, 18 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Profanacje[edit]

Autor dwugłowej kaczki podobnej do Orła Białego równie bezceremonialnie potraktował godła naszych sąsiadów: [1]. Jeśli więc zgłaszać coś do skasowania, to cały jego wkład. Społeczność Commons z reguły odpiera żądania opierane na prawie państw innych niż USA, gdzie są przechowywane pliki; a tam już dawno sąd uznał, że można np. spalić flagę w ramach wyrażania poglądów.

Póki co opatrzyłem pliki szablonem stwierdzającym, że są nieprzydatne dla projektu poza stroną użytkownika; moim zdaniem to wystarczy.

Pozdrawiam! A.J. (talk) 08:52, 25 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:IRPmagnates.PNG[edit]

Fajna mapka, ale czemy Wiśniowieccy, Zbarawscy i Zasławcy są w jednej kupie? Zasławcy jesli juz z kims to mogliby byc z Ostrogoskimi... nie mógłbys tej trojki rozbic? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 18:18, 26 February 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Truce of Andrusovo[edit]

Moglbys zrobic mapke pokazujaca terytoria utracone po Andrusowie (pl:Rozejm andruszowski)? W zasadzie mamy mapki z przed i po: File:Irp1686.png i File:Irp1635.png, np. - choc 86 to juz pl:Pokój Grzymułtowskiego... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 22:11, 2 March 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mapki[edit]

Moze ci sie przydadza. To z atlasu ICPa: download. Pozdr, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 01:03, 18 March 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Woj. witebskie[edit]

Dwie rózne mapki: File:WitebskieIRP.JPG twoja i ta: File:Vitebsk Voivodeship within Lithuania in the 17th century.png. W twojej, mscisławskie jest wieksze...? Odpowiedz najlepiej kierowac na en:Talk:Vitebsk_Voivodeship#Map. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 17:09, 7 April 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pilsudski na Maderze[edit]

Tak, to ja zrobilem te fotografie w 2000 r. Owczesni wlasciciele wpuscili mnie do srodka i pozwolili sfotografowac tablice. Zauwazylem, ze na Twoim zdjeciu brak tej wiekszej. Moze zostala przeniesiona nizej? Byloby raczej nie do pomyslenie, zeby tak po prostu usunac te tablice. Czy willa ma teraz nowych wlascicieli?

Pozdrowienia,

Kiejstut9∼∼∼∼

Pieczęć Kazimierza Kujawskiego[edit]

Nowicjuszem nie jest: ma spory wkład własny i dużo reprodukcji starych fotografii i rycin, gdyby to było jego własne zdjecie nie omieszkałby zapewne się tym pochwalić. A.J. (talk) 09:05, 15 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bot kategoryzujący[edit]

Trzeba po prostu po nim poprawiać: każde automatyczne działanie zawsze będzie narażone na błędy; a tutaj dodatkowo dochodzi heurystyka. Bot o ile wiem "atakuje" jedynie zdjęcia bez żadnej kategorii: moim zdaniem nawet błędna kategoria jest lepsza niż żadna, bo do błędnej ktoś trafi i poprawi, a do żadnej: nie. A.J. (talk) 18:53, 17 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Categories ... of/in Poland[edit]

It's not a good idea to add Categories ... of/in Poland to single pictures [2]. --Matthead (talk) 04:52, 26 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Józef Bem 111.JPG[edit]

To trochę nie tak - niezależnie do tego czy to jest zdjęcie, czy skan - w sposób dość oczywisty jest to prosta reprodukcja dwuwymiarowego dzieła sztuki. Zasady licencjonowania Commons stwierdzają, że tego typu reprodukcje umieszczamy na licencji PD-Art lub PD-Old - niezależnie od tego kto wykonał zdjęcie czy skan. Jest nawet na to odpowiednia rezolucja Wikimedia Foundation. Patrz: Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag. Inne zamieszczone przez Ciebie tego typu reprodukcje również powinny mieć zmienioną odpowiednio licencję. Polimerek (talk) 08:38, 28 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Chyba nie zrozumiałeś tego opisu. Przeczytaj fragment o tym jak oznaczać tego rodzaju zdjęcia/reprodukcje: "The "PD-Art" tag should not be used:

When you yourself personally took the photograph

In such a case, simply add the "PD-Old" tag to show that the work of art is itself in the public domain."

A wyżej jest napisane:

"The rule therefore excludes from copyright protection photographs which are intended to be no more than a faithful reproduction of a two-dimensional work of art such as a painting. If only technical expertise is involved (to take a faithful and unimaginative picture), the photograph acquires no copyright protection in its own right."

W tym przypadku tak jest - Twoim celem było zrobienie zdjęcia, które miało jak najwierniej oddawać oryginał. Nie ma w tym żadnego wkładu twórczego i w zasadzie nie powinno być, gdyż jak rozumiem Twoją intencją było wykonanie jak najbardziej wiernej kopii oryginału. Polimerek (talk) 21:35, 29 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

To co w takim razie było celem wykonania tego zdjęcia? Oddanie wierne wyglądu oryginalnej pracy, czy nie? To jest tu kluczowym pytaniem. Jeśli celem było oddanie wyglądu oryginału jak najwierniej to wówczas z definicji nie ma i nie powinno być w tym żadnego wkładu twórczego. Jedyne co robisz to stosujesz różne techniczne operacje - takie jak np: poprawa kolorystyki w edytorze zdjęć - aby jak najwierniej oddać oryginał. To samo np: robi konserwator obrazu usuwając warstwę starego werniksu, czy uzupełniając ubytki. Nie czyni go to jednak właścicielem praw autorskich do wyglądu obrazu po konserwacji. Ten ktoś, kto opublikował album ze zdjęciami obrazów z domeny publicznej może sobie pisać, że obejmuje swoimi prawami autorskimi te reprodukcje, nie ma to jednak żadnej faktycznej mocy prawnej. Musiał by w sądzie dowieść, że wykonanie tej reprodukcji było w jakikolwiek sposób przejawem jego indywidualnej twórczości, a wtedy sąd by zapytał co było celem wykonania tej reprodukcji - czy wierne oddanie wyglądu oryginału, czy też coś innego? I jeśli coś innego, to co to w takim razie było? Polimerek (talk) 10:36, 31 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Poprawki obrazów[edit]

Jak przepuszczasz przez rozmaite "upiększające" filtry inne oryginalne obrazy i dokumenty, to się nie przejmujesz jakoś licencją :)

A poważnie: oczywiście że można, w tym przypadku to by było nawet bardzo wskazane.

Licencja nie zabrania również wygładzania, poprawy kolorów itp. na starych fotografiach albo rycinach, o których wspomniałem wyżej. Moim zdaniem jednak takie nadjedzone zębem czasu grafiki prezentują się nawet korzystniej, niż po elektronicznym retuszu, ale to temat na osobną dyskusję (o ile już kiedyś jej nie odbyliśmy i nie rozstaliśmy się każdy ze swoim zdaniem).

Pozdrawiam serdecznie!

A.J. (talk) 06:27, 8 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:7_TP_tank.PNG[edit]

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:7_TP_tank.PNG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Kam Solusar (talk) 14:13, 1 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Saint George in Danzig.PNG[edit]

Rodaku!

Czemu ładując grafiki związane z Gdańskiem, tytułujesz "Danzig"? Czy byłeś kiedyś w Bydgoszczy? Napiszesz wtedy "Bromberg"? Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 13:42, 12 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Jacek_Malczewski.PNG[edit]

File:Jacek_Malczewski.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Herr Kriss (talk) 18:32, 7 October 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Prośba[edit]

Proszę podać, gdzie znajduje się ten nagrobek: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sebastian_Petrycy.jpg . Dziękuję i pozdrawiam! Paterm (talk) 20:36, 31 October 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Książęta pomorscy[edit]

Posiadam dwie książki o książętach pomorskich: Rodowód książąt pomorskich Rymara i Poczet książąt gdańskich Śliwińskiego w których te portrety są reprodukowane, jednak pod innymi osobami:

File:Sambor I, Duke of Pomerania.PNG jest zamieszczony jako portret Mściwoja I,
File:Mestwin I, Duke of Pomerania.PNG został zamieszczony jako portret Mściwoja II.

Proszę o poprawienie błędu i przeniesienie obrazów pod poprawne nazwy. Mareczko (talk) 14:52, 28 December 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Portrety Sambora i Mściwoja są bardzo podobne. Postaram się wysłac portret Sambora na Commons. Mareczko (talk) 17:45, 29 December 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Władysław Łokietek seal 1320.PNG[edit]

File:Władysław Łokietek seal 1320.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

--— Kpalion^(talk) 13:36, 17 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Polska i Litwa 1386-1434[edit]

Właściwie to powinienem zaznaczyć pozostałe księstwa ruskie: Riazańskie i Wierchowskie również tym samym kolorem. Właściwa Złota Orda to tak wąski pasek na tej mapie, że napis ledwo wchodzi. Mam też wątpliwość jaki dać tytuł mapy, bo samo Polska raczej nie powinno być. Chyba najlepsze i najkrótsze to Polska i Litwa, co o tym myślisz? Pozdrawiam Poznaniak (dyskusja) 17:30, 19 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Poprawione. Te drobne księstwa ruskie podpisałem analogicznie do "Księstw Śląskich" "Księstwa Ruskie" nie mam materiałów do ustalenia ich dokładnych granic na przestrzeni tak długiego czasu. Pozdrawiam Poznaniak (dyskusja) 20:25, 20 February 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Warsaw Royal Castle[edit]

Nie rozumiem dlaczego uporczywie zaśmiecasz kategorię Warsaw Royal Castle, skoro istnieją odpowiednie podkategorie!!! Wystarczy sprawdzić!!! Na pewno znajdziesz odpowiednią, zamiast zrzucać to na innych. Ponadto pliki skategoryzowane są łatwiejsze do odszukania przez pozostałych. BurgererSF (talk) 07:46, 13 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:14th, 15th Infantry Regiment of Polish Army of November Uprising.JPG[edit]

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:14th, 15th Infantry Regiment of Polish Army of November Uprising.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Lukasz Lukomski (talk) 23:16, 11 April 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:August_Zaleski.JPG[edit]

File:August_Zaleski.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Masur (talk) 08:54, 16 April 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:Herb_Piastów.PNG[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Herb_Piastów.PNG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Masur (talk) 09:00, 16 April 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Gediminas.gif[edit]

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Gediminas.gif, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Gediminas.gif]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 09:01, 16 April 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Pedro.jpg[edit]

File:Pedro.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

--Bestiasonica (talk) 07:20, 24 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Election of Stanisław August Poniatowski in 1764 (detail).PNG[edit]

Zwracaj uwage na poprawne licencjonowanie. Dzieki. Masur (talk) 09:05, 2 June 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Date might be wrong on the 1635 map[edit]

FYI [3] Thanks -Chumchum7 (talk) 09:49, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Władysław_Grabski.PNG[edit]

File:Władysław_Grabski.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Vearthy (talk) 13:45, 14 October 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Muscovy cavalryman mid XVI century.PNG[edit]

Witam! Czy mógłbyś podać źródło(a) do pliku Muscovy cavalryman mid XVI century? W dyskusji do artykułu "Husaria" została zakwestionowana jego autentyczność. Plikowi zarzuca się powstanie w Photoshopie oraz bycie swego rodzaju kolażem. --83.218.198.165 13:19, 11 November 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Prince Joseph Poniatowski 111.PNG[edit]

Deutsch ∙ čeština ∙ català ∙ English ∙ español ∙ sicilianu ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ українська ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ slovenščina ∙ polski ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ 日本語 ∙ slovenčina ∙ فارسی ∙ македонски ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ русский ∙ հայերեն ∙ suomi ∙ Nederlands ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ עברית ∙ italiano ∙ português ∙ +/−

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:55, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Prince Joseph Poniatowski 111.PNG[edit]

Deutsch ∙ čeština ∙ català ∙ English ∙ español ∙ sicilianu ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ українська ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ slovenščina ∙ polski ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ 日本語 ∙ slovenčina ∙ فارسی ∙ македонски ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ русский ∙ հայերեն ∙ suomi ∙ Nederlands ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ עברית ∙ italiano ∙ português ∙ +/−

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:07, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Please use the correct date format[edit]

Hi Mathiasrex,

Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed you mentioned a date on File:Atanazy Miączyński.PNG. Please know that in order for dates to be automatically detected and translated into other languages it needs to be in the YYYY-MM-DD format (ie. 2022-01 for January 2022 or 2022-12-21 for 21 December 2022). Also, for other (less specific) dates use {{Other date}} for centuries, ranges, 'circa' etc. like this: {{other date|between|1899|1903}} for "between 1899 and 1903

". This way the dates will be translated internally into the user's language preference. I've fixed it for you here. See for example the result in Polish: here. Thanks again. –Krinkle^talk 18:17, 9 December 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:SLedóchowski.JPG[edit]

File:SLedóchowski.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Santosga (talk) 13:39, 13 December 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Louis2.jpg[edit]

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Louis2.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:07, 3 January 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Herb_Trzaska11.jpg[edit]

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Herb_Trzaska11.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:19, 4 January 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Herb_Przemysla_II_z_plaszczem.png[edit]

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Herb_Przemysla_II_z_plaszczem.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Herb_Przemysla_II_z_plaszczem.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JDavid (talk) 13:27, 8 January 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Polish_White_Eagle_of_Przemysł_II.PNG[edit]

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Polish_White_Eagle_of_Przemysł_II.PNG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Polish_White_Eagle_of_Przemysł_II.PNG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JDavid (talk) 14:34, 9 January 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Polish_White_Eagle_of_Przemysł_II.PNG[edit]

File:Polish_White_Eagle_of_Przemysł_II.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

and File:Herb Przemysla II z plaszczem.png JDavid (talk) 22:49, 9 January 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File tagging File:Podlaskie.JPG[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Podlaskie.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Podlaskie.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

JDavid (talk) 00:09, 10 January 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

and File:Mścisławskie.JPG JDavid (talk) 00:11, 10 January 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Jagiellon countries[edit]

Look File talk:Jagiellon countries 1490.PNG! Yours' sincerely, Ulamm (talk) 15:13, 19 January 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Herb Gryfitów.PNG[edit]

Witaj. Przedstawiłeś w grafice File:Herb Gryfitów.PNG, że jesteś jej autorem i nadałeś jej licencje GFDL i Creative Commons. A ta grafika File:Pommernwappen.jpg została wrzucona do Commons w 2005 roku, gdzie przedstawia się, że autorem jest de:Benutzer:Muggmag. Proszę Ciebie o informacje kto w końcu jest jej autorem, lub jakie może być pierwotne źródło tej grafiki? Dziękuję serdecznie i pozrawiam JDavid (talk) 15:49, 13 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Powstanie_Listopadowe_symbol.PNG[edit]

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Powstanie_Listopadowe_symbol.PNG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Powstanie_Listopadowe_symbol.PNG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JDavid (talk) 12:51, 20 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Warszawa_1861_1.JPG[edit]

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Warszawa_1861_1.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 16:13, 23 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Fieldorf.JPG[edit]

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Fieldorf.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Fieldorf.JPG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 17:34, 24 February 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Crivelli Carlo, Annunciation.jpg[edit]

Dzień dobry. Nowa wersja kolorystyczna była zdecydowanie zanadto niebieska, co aż się rzucało w oczy. Proszę porównać ze zdjęciem na stronie NG. Cancre (talk) 22:19, 3 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

2th?[edit]

Please check it: 12th or 2nd? Your Description: "2th" --91.4.43.232 16:45, 10 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Henry_I_the_Fowler.jpg[edit]

Hello,

I am HR from the french WP. I would like to inform you that this picture : http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Henry_I_the_Fowler.JPG#.7B.7Bint:filedesc.7D.7D is, according to the french book: Nazisme et Société Secrète ((Secret Society & Nazism), from Jean-Claude Frère, P.226) in fact a picture of Heinrich Himmler, under the Henry I's appearence, being use for propaganda. I changed the description already, but i can't change de file name.

Thanks you, HR. --82.238.228.67 22:47, 14 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It seems that my information about this picture was wrong. Sorry for that.

Am looking for more information about it.

File source is not properly indicated: File:Deep_Impact_Discovery_Mission_to_Comet_Tempel_1.PNG[edit]

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Deep_Impact_Discovery_Mission_to_Comet_Tempel_1.PNG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 03:29, 18 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Juzef Stanisłaŭ Sapieha. Юзэф Станіслаў Сапега.jpg‎[edit]

Przepraszam, ale według tego źródłu (www.wilanow-palac.pl) to portret właśnie Józefa Stanisława. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 16:13, 31 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:CeciliaRenata.jpg[edit]

File:CeciliaRenata.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

BurgererSF (talk) 12:48, 18 May 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

WBC[edit]

Kawał dobrej roboty z umozliwieniem wykorzystania zasobów Wielkopolskiej BC. Czy już skończyłes to dzieło czy będziesz jeszcze kontynuował? Oczywiscie mowie o tematyce militarnej--keriM (talk) 09:45, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Blaise_Pascal.PNG[edit]

File:Blaise_Pascal.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Nilfanion (talk) 09:41, 24 July 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Vincent de Paul.PNG[edit]

File:Vincent de Paul.PNG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Quantité négligeable (talk) 04:09, 29 July 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dzięki za odpowiedź. Sprawa jasna. Pozdrawiam Quantité négligeable (talk) 17:56, 2 August 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Halford Mackinder.jpg[edit]

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Halford Mackinder.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:36, 3 August 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

error fixed?[edit]

See [4]. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 18:44, 22 August 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:KazKuj.JPG[edit]

Witaj. Proszę Ciebie o uzupełnienie źródła File:KazKuj.JPG, skąd zaczerpnąłeś ową grafikę. JDavid (talk) 14:14, 25 August 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dziękuję. JDavid (talk) 12:53, 26 August 2011 (UTC) PS Zmieniłem nazwę pliku.Reply[reply]

Bitwa pod Budziszynem 1945[edit]

"Święta racja", dzięki, już poprawiłem, czekamy aż zrobi to COMMONS. Przy okazji wylazło, że zamieściłem dwa takie same malunki, dzisiaj zawiesiłem poprawny (drugi etap bitwy) i stosownie podmieniłem. Pozdrawiam lonio17 (talk) 14:49, 16 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Grand_Duke_Constantine_Pavlovich_of_Russia.PNG[edit]

File:Grand_Duke_Constantine_Pavlovich_of_Russia.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Shakko (talk) 17:07, 21 September 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth[edit]

Hi, could you respect subcategories in the Category:Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, thanks BurgererSF (talk) 22:18, 12 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:JanTarnowski.jpg[edit]

File:JanTarnowski.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

BurgererSF (talk) 22:24, 12 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Lion_near_Baszta_Prochowa_in_Lviv.JPG[edit]

File:Lion_near_Baszta_Prochowa_in_Lviv.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Dcoetzee (talk) 13:59, 13 December 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Judeopolonia 1914.PNG[edit]

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Judeopolonia 1914.PNG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Judeopolonia 1914.PNG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 14:08, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Duchy of Warsaw 11.PNG[edit]

File:Duchy of Warsaw 11.PNG have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

JDavid (talk) 13:17, 5 February 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Siege of Danzig 1734.PNG[edit]

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Siege of Danzig 1734.PNG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Cathy Richards (talk) 21:14, 12 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Nicholas V Papa.JPG[edit]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Nicholas V Papa.JPG[edit]

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Nicholas V Papa.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Nicholas V Papa.JPG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Cutwind (talk) 15:03, 23 March 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re:Maps in svg[edit]

Hello;). Ja wiem, ze Litwa byla czescia Rz-plitej Obojga Narodow- na mapie widac, ze granice panstwowe obejmuja ten obszar. Inny kolor ma sluzyc lepszemu obrazowaniu. Wrzucona przez Ciebie wersja jest obrazem przeklejonym na warstwe przez co nie nie bedzie sie jej dalo skalowac, co neguje cale przedsiewziecie konstruowania obrazu wektorowego. Poza tym jest niewyrazna i trudno z niej cokolwiek przeczytac. pzdr Hoodinski (talk) 16:05, 19 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Kwestia techniczna- nie da sie skonwertowac obrazu bezsciezkowego (takiego jak JPG czy PNG) na obraz wektorowy. Mapy, ktore stworzylem tylko opieraja sie na Twoich plikach, poniewaz wszystkie ich elementy (sciezki, teksty) wykonalem sam; z grzecznosci umiescilem w opisie adres pliku bazowego. Nie uwazam, jakoby uzycie innego koloru dla Litwy w tym wypadku bylo w jakikolwiek sposob 'misleading' (tak samo jak wyroznienie Szkocji czy Anglii na mapie pounijnej). Oscienne panstwa zostaly oznaczone innymi barwami i dodatkowo odpowiednio opisane w legendzie. pzdr Hoodinski (talk) 09:36, 20 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Seismosaurus 02.png[edit]

File:Seismosaurus 02.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 04:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mistake in your slavs map[edit]

In this map you have a mistake

Where are the Germanics?

Take a look at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Hypothetical_ethnogenesis_of_the_Slavs_ca._1000_B._C..PNG#Proto_Finno_Ugric

You have twice the finno ugrics and no time the germanics. --80.39.227.138 00:43, 29 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:Bolesław Wysoki seal.PNG[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bolesław Wysoki seal.PNG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 02:19, 17 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FYI[edit]

User_talk:Masur#Czy_PD-Arty_moga_miec_CC.3F. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 17:11, 30 October 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re: Herb Kongresówki[edit]

Nie jestem o tym przekonany. Tam nie ma żadnej tarczy. Moim zdaniem jest to samo godło umieszczone na białej powierzchni słupa. Nawiasem mówiąc nie jestem też przekonany czy carski orzeł z "Herbu Kongresówki" występował kiedykolwiek na tarczy. Mam wrażenie że umieszczenie go na jakiejkolwiek tarczy, białej czy złotej to lekki OR. Pozdrawiam. Avalokitesvara (talk) 10:40, 12 November 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re: Herb Kazimierza Wielkiego[edit]

Cześć! Mogę podjąć się tego zlecenia, ale tylko jeśli nie potrzebujesz tego pilnie. Ostatnio u mnie gorzej z czasem... Avalokitesvara (talk) 08:55, 7 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File tagging File:HIM byMaurizio Cattelan in Warsaw Ghetto 2013.JPG[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:HIM byMaurizio Cattelan in Warsaw Ghetto 2013.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Diannaa (talk) 14:59, 10 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Podpis[edit]

Mam inne zdanie. Żeby coś łamało prawo to musi być utworem. Zgłoś na COM:DR jak uważasz to za słuszne. Krzysiu (talk) 20:13, 29 January 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons:When to use the PD-signature tag. Mam powody sądzić, że celowo napisałeś do mnie, chociaż widać, że moja aktywność jest bliska zeru, żeby mi to wypomnieć. Proszę o wyjaśnienie czemu byłem adresatem tej wypowiedzi - chciałbym, żeby takie rzeczy zostały wyjaśniane, jeśli są podejrzenia. Cóż, Commons się zmienia i kiedyś rzeczy, które by nie przeszły, teraz są na porządku dziennym, por. Category:Signatures of people from the United States (a kiedyś podpis Kuronia by nie przeszedł, bo był uznawany za utwór, do czego się nie odniosłeś, tylko pisałeś o rzeczach, które nie mają znaczenia jeśli coś nie jest utworem; to jakby zastanawiać się nad tym jakiego gatunku muzycznego jest Wikipedia) czy Category:Logos, a kiedyś logo metra warszawskiego było bez problemów wywalane. Krzysiu (talk) 00:45, 1 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

PS: No i każde zdjęcie na Commons, poza PD, jest własnościa intelektualną autora. Rezygnuje się z praw majątkowych, czasem częściowo. Krzysiu (talk) 00:46, 1 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Powstanie Styczniowe symbol.PNG[edit]

Grafika którą umieściłem w Commons File:Powstanie Styczniowe symbol.PNG została zgłoszona do usunięcia . JDavid (talk) 10:35, 4 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Płk Ryszard Kukliński.jpg[edit]

File:Płk Ryszard Kukliński.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

russavia (talk) 08:41, 20 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth 1773-1789.PNG[edit]

Edytor na en wiki zwrocil uwage, ze ta mapa bylaby o wiele lepsza gdyby byly na niej jasne granice przedrozbiorowe. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 01:42, 5 April 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Obóz przesiedleńczy w Regensburgu[edit]

Mam do Pana nietypową prośbę. Otóż szukam jakichkolwiek informacji (także życie codzienne) i zdjęć dotyczących Obozu przesiedleńczego w Regensburgu - lata 1945-1947. Nie znalazłem żadnych informacji na ten temat. Gdzie mam szukać? --Lesław Zimny (talk) 17:48, 26 June 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:Georgij Konisski.PNG[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Georgij Konisski.PNG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 20:59, 19 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Zrodlo[edit]

Moglbys dodac jakies zrodlo do File:PolishRuswar1792.PNG? Jest o to prosba na [5]. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 06:11, 13 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dzieki! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 08:59, 13 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:Franciszek Gajewski.PNG[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Franciszek Gajewski.PNG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 18:47, 13 September 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Podział administracyjny I RP.png[edit]

Poprawione. Dzięki za uwagę. Pozdrawiam Poznaniak (dyskusja) 18:10, 9 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Battle of Warsaw (1831) - files[edit]

Hi there. I'm pushing the article on the en:Battle of Warsaw (1831) up for GA and FA status. However, there is a problem with two pics you uploaded and apparently scanned: File:5th, 6th, 7th Infantry Regiment of Polish Army of November Uprising.JPG and File:General Staff of Polish Army during November Uprising.JPG. Could you provide the true source of the pictures? Title of a book would do, if there's no more info available. Thanks in advance. Halibutt (talk) 15:57, 20 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Poprawilbys te swoje opisy. Taken - z ksiazki? Z muzeum? Jak robisz zdjecia w muzeum, opisuj w jakim, chocby przez kategorie. Ps. Grzecznie prosze, bo szkoda by bylo jakby te setki zdjec, ktore porobiles, bardzo cennych, polecialo przez takie drobiazgi. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 07:01, 22 October 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Prośba o zamieszczenie fotografii na commons[edit]

Dobry wieczór

Pisze do Pana trochę z przypadku, bo nie wiem do kogo się zwrócić, a moje dotychczasowe prośby skierowane do wikipedystów spełzły na niczym, dlatego pomyślałem, że zwrócę się do Pana, ponieważ wiem, że zajmuje się Pan fotografiką, a chodzi mi właśnie o zamieszczenie na commons fotografii, które chce w tym celu udostępnić Muzeum w Gliwicach, w którym pół roku temu odbyła się wystawa poświęcona księciu Józefowi Poniatowskiemu i właśnie z tej wystawy mają to być fotografie, i jak dziś się dowiedziałem jest tych fotografii w posiadaniu Muzeum sporo, dlatego umówiłem się z pracownikami, iż mailowo poinformuję o jakie fotografie chodzi, w sensie - co mają przedstawiać, i takie Muzeum postara się udostępnić tyle, że ja nie jestem wikipedystą i nie wiem jak zamieścić te fotografie na commons, dlatego szukam kogoś, kto by poświęcił godzinę swego życiorysu na zamieszczenie tych zdjęć, bo wydaje mi się, że potrzebnych będzie w sumie nie więcej niż 20, góra 30 fotografii, spośród których kilka będzie pokazywać całą salę wystawową, a reszta kilkanaście najważniejszych obiektów, które wiem, że na wystawie się znajdowały i są ważne z punktu widzenia historii, sztuki i biografii księcia Józefa, np. filiżanka porcelanowa z miniaturą portretową przedstawiającą księcia Józefa, porcelanowa fajka ozdobiona miniaturką przedstawiającą śmierć księcia Józefa, figurki porcelanowe oraz brązowe przedstawiające księcia Józefa, pierścień wykuty wg tradycji z podkowy konia księcia Józefa, pamiątkowe medale wybite na cześć księcia Józefa, dokumenty urzędowe z podpisem księcia Józefa, egzemplarz Kodeksu Napoleońskiego z epoki oraz kilka portretów księcia Józefa, a więc fotografie te będą pomocne nie tylko w zilustrowaniu biogramu księcia Józefa, ale także mogą zostać wykorzystane jako ikonografia do artykułów poświęconych Willi Caro, w której wystawa się odbywała, Muzeum w Gliwicach, które było organizatorem, czy wreszcie poszczególnych muzeów, z których eksponaty zostały wypożyczone dlatego, wydaje mi się, że gra jest warta świeczki i dlatego, jeśli tylko jest Pan zainteresowany zamieszczeniem tych fotografii na commons, to proszę o szybką odpowiedź.

Pozdrawiam, Adam

Witam! Dziękuję za odpowiedź, tym bardziej, że jest pozytywna! :) I oczywiście prześlę Panu fotografie, ale jak już poprzednio napisałem, najpierw muszę o nie grzecznie poprosić w mailu skierowanym do Muzeum w Gliwicach, ponieważ to ja jestem petentem (de facto wikipedia) i tylko ze względu no to, że zadzwoniłem i przekonywująco uzasadniłem potrzebę zamieszczenia takich fotografii na wikipedii, władni w tej kwestii pracownicy wyrazili na to zgodę. Dlatego, w pierwszej kolejności musiałem znaleźć kogoś chętnego do zamieszczenia owych fotografii na commons, a skoro już się Osoba znalazła :) wobec tego, teraz muszę wysłać do Muzeum maila, aby już konkretnie powiedzieć, co mają zdjęcia przedstawiać, a więc w chwili obecnej pozostaje czekanie, myślę kilka dni, na przesłanie fotografii z Muzeum i dopiero wtedy będę mógł przesłać je Panu, lub poprosić Muzeum o nadesłanie innych fotografii, bo jak na razie wszystko jest dopiero na etapie dogadywania się i zawsze może się okazać, że część nadesłanych fotografii, może nie nadawać się do zamieszczenia na commons i będzie trzeba prosić o inne. Natomiast, zanim wyślę wspomnianego maila do Muzeum, proszę mi jeszcze powiedzieć jakiego rodzaju licencje mogę pracownikom Muzeum w tym mailu zaproponować, bo z grzeczności wypada wymienić przynajmniej dwie, a z rozsądku - wskazać wśród nich najkorzystniejszą dla nas :) A jak powiedziałem, w chwili obecnej dopiero będziemy dogadywać szczegóły, dlatego w rozmowie telefonicznej z pracownikami Muzeum o licencji nic nie wspominałem, tym bardziej, że nie wiem jakie na commons są stosowane, bo nie jestem wikipedystą i nie mam bladego pojęcia jak zamieszczać fotografie na commons i przecież dlatego w ogóle się kontaktujemy! :) A więc proszę w dwóch słowach powiedzieć jakie licencje mogę zaproponować dla Muzeum, a ja Im to w mailu napiszę i wszystko będzie jasne. Wesołych świąt! :) i do usłyszenia! :) Adam

chyba przeoczył Pan mój post sprzed 4 dni, dlatego wklejam go jeszcze raz =[edit]

oczywiście prześlę Panu fotografie, ale jak już poprzednio napisałem, najpierw muszę o nie grzecznie poprosić w mailu skierowanym do Muzeum w Gliwicach, ponieważ to ja jestem petentem (de facto wikipedia) i tylko ze względu no to, że zadzwoniłem i przekonywująco uzasadniłem potrzebę zamieszczenia takich fotografii na wikipedii, władni w tej kwestii pracownicy wyrazili na to zgodę. Dlatego, w pierwszej kolejności musiałem znaleźć kogoś chętnego do zamieszczenia owych fotografii na commons, a skoro już się Osoba znalazła :) wobec tego, teraz muszę wysłać do Muzeum maila, aby już konkretnie powiedzieć, co mają zdjęcia przedstawiać, a więc w chwili obecnej pozostaje czekanie, myślę kilka dni, na przesłanie fotografii z Muzeum i dopiero wtedy będę mógł przesłać je Panu, lub poprosić Muzeum o nadesłanie innych fotografii, bo jak na razie wszystko jest dopiero na etapie dogadywania się i zawsze może się okazać, że część nadesłanych fotografii, może nie nadawać się do zamieszczenia na commons i będzie trzeba prosić o inne. Natomiast, zanim wyślę wspomnianego maila do Muzeum, proszę mi jeszcze powiedzieć jakiego rodzaju licencje mogę pracownikom Muzeum w tym mailu zaproponować, bo z grzeczności wypada wymienić przynajmniej dwie, a z rozsądku - wskazać wśród nich najkorzystniejszą dla nas :) A jak powiedziałem, w chwili obecnej dopiero będziemy dogadywać szczegóły, dlatego w rozmowie telefonicznej z pracownikami Muzeum o licencji nic nie wspominałem, tym bardziej, że nie wiem jakie na commons są stosowane, bo nie jestem wikipedystą i nie mam bladego pojęcia jak zamieszczać fotografie na commons i przecież dlatego w ogóle się kontaktujemy! :) A więc proszę w dwóch słowach powiedzieć jakie licencje mogę zaproponować dla Muzeum, a ja Im to w mailu napiszę i wszystko będzie jasne.

Iwo Odrowąż[edit]

Bardzo proszę o podanie możliwości uzyskania licencji na wykorzystanie zdjęcia: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Iwo_Odrow%C4%85%C5%BC,_Bishop_of_Krak%C3%B3w.PNG

kontakt: info@soulseedmedia.pl

Pozdrawiam serdecznie!

File:RomanCatholicismInEurope.png[edit]

File:RomanCatholicismInEurope.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Grsd (talk) 11:13, 20 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Halford Mackinder.jpg[edit]

File:Halford Mackinder.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

2001:6A8:3500:B00B:9923:B85B:2115:B08B 09:01, 21 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You uploaded File:Bitwa_pod_Oliwą_1627_3.JPG in 2006, dating it to the late 17th century. Recently, someone has added info that this was made by a modern artist who died in 1970. Do you know where you found the original image?

Peter ^Isotalo 20:38, 22 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you[edit]

File:Friedrich Wilhelm Rembert von Berg.PNG is in this week in Estonian wikipedia main page, because et:Friedrich Wilhelm Rembert von Berg is article of the week. Thank you for nice picture! Taivo (talk) 13:10, 11 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Jacob Kettler thaler from 1645.PNG[edit]

hello! i have a favour to ask. do you happen to have taken the other side of the coin? with Jacob Kettler on it. if yes - would you please consider uploading it to commons? we have a non-free file locally and it is not right. thanks anyway --アンタナナ 09:25, 18 April 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Giving thanks[edit]

	Giving thanks
	Thanks for your image of the dragon. Dafne07 (talk) 12:42, 6 May 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Zrodla w mapkach[edit]

Czy mozesz dodac zrodla ksiazkowe do File:Religions in Poland 1573.PNG i File:Religions in Poland 1750.PNG? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 07:59, 14 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

A nie pamietasz, jakich konkretnie? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 09:29, 29 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hmmm, nawet taka notke warto by dodac przy okazji. A jak sobie przypomnisz mniej wiecej ktore, to tez - na en wiki niekiedy usuwa sie mapki bez zrodel, a szkoda, bo twoje zawsze sa bardzo wartosciowe. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 10:42, 30 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Tadeusz Reytan.JPG[edit]

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Tadeusz Reytan.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 06:08, 13 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Boris Sheremetyev.PNG[edit]

File:Boris Sheremetyev.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Shakko (talk) 16:08, 8 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Religions in Poland 1750.PNG[edit]

File:Religions in Poland 1750.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

79.184.85.17 21:18, 18 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Correction Request: The Armenian Apostolic Church is erroneously colored as being part of the Eastern Orthodox Church, but it is a separate Christian denomination.[edit]

Hello.

The Armenian Apostolic Church is erroneously colored (in red) as being part of the Eastern Orthodox Church in the map File:Europe religion map.png and in all in its different language versions File:Europe religion map-ar.png, File:Europe religion map de.png, File:Europe religion map en.png, File:Europe religion map fr.png etc., which is incorrect because it is a separate Christian denomination. Could you color Armenia and the breakaway Nagorno-Karabakh region of Azerbaijan in a different color in all these maps?

Thank you.

-- IP User 31.200.10.222 (talk) 17:52, 27 December 2014‎ (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Blessed Vitus of Lithuania.PNG[edit]

File:Blessed Vitus of Lithuania.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

195.50.31.213 20:07, 24 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Czartoryski[edit]

Obawiam się, że zaszła pomyłka co do autorstwa pliku Adam Jerzy Czartoryski 1.PNG Prawdopodobnym autorem jest Leon Kapliński. Proponowałbym korektę opisu, ale nie chciałbym sam ingerować bez zgody Kolegi. Pozdrowienia --Szczebrzeszynski (talk) 09:24, 12 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Zauważyłem, że obraz został początkowo określony jako anonimowy, dopiero później został dopisany do kategorii Iłłakowicza. --Szczebrzeszynski (talk) 10:19, 13 March 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Correction Request: The Armenian Apostolic Church is erroneously colored as being part of the Eastern Orthodox Church, but it is a separate Christian denomination.[edit]

Hello.

The Armenian Apostolic Church is erroneously colored (in red) as being part of the Eastern Orthodox Church in the map File:Europe religion map.png and in all in its different language versions File:Europe religion map-ar.png, File:Europe religion map de.png, File:Europe religion map en.png, File:Europe religion map fr.png etc., which is incorrect because it is a separate Christian denomination. Could you color Armenia and the breakaway Nagorno-Karabakh region of Azerbaijan in a different color in all these maps?

Thank you.

-- IP User 31.200.19.242 (talk) 21:24, 15 March 2015‎ (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Polish language frequency in Poland in 1931 1.PNG[edit]

File:Polish language frequency in Poland in 1931 1.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Poeticbent talk 18:13, 5 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ludwik Węgierski seal 1370.PNG[edit]

File:Ludwik Węgierski seal 1370.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hchc2009 (talk) 22:23, 31 July 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Herby I Rzeczpospolitej[edit]

Witam. Czy chodzi o ten herb? W zasadzie trzeba by odwrócić tylko orła, bo tarcza nie do końca jest symetryczna. Przepraszam, ze dopiero dzisiaj ale prawie już tu nie zaglądam. Pozdrawiam. Bastianow (talk) 22:25, 15 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Fiodor Nesselrode (1786-1868).PNG[edit]

File:Fiodor Nesselrode (1786-1868).PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Halibutt (talk) 01:10, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Polish_Winged_Hussars[edit]

Polish Winged Hussars has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Zoupan (talk) 03:05, 4 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Palen.jpg[edit]

File:Palen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Ghirlandajo (talk) 17:54, 1 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Prince Joseph Poniatowski by Brodowski.PNG[edit]

File:Prince Joseph Poniatowski by Brodowski.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

WQUlrich (talk) 23:19, 5 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Personal informants of secret services in Polish People's Republic[edit]

Witaj, zauważyłem, że dla stworzonych przeze mnie folderów polskich polityków dodajesz tę kategorię. Jak jest podstawa np. tej edycji? Prośba o podanie precyzyjnego kryterium. Przejrzałem wyrywkowo kilka haseł o tych politykach na pl-Wiki, i nie ma w nich nic na ten temat.Dziękuję. Boston9 (talk) 20:27, 6 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Personal_informants_of_secret_services_in_Polish_People's_Republic[edit]

Category:Personal_informants_of_secret_services_in_Polish_People's_Republic has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Powerek38 (talk) 08:53, 7 February 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Site missing[edit]

Hello!

Do you have any idea what happened to http://dziedzictwo.polska.pl ?

Regards Eneida Osipov

File:Eagles of the Polish Legions in World War I (Austria-Hungary).png[edit]

Witam,

Mam takie pytanie. Czy jesteś w 100% pewien, że są to orły Legionów Polskich 1914-1917? Mnie zastanawia, że wszystkie mają koronę oraz numer pułku. Orły legionowe powinny mieć raczej zamiast numeru pułku literę "L" lub "S", zwłaszcza w I Brygadzie (pułki 1, 5 i 7). Tomasz Zawistowski w swoich artykułach nic nie wspomina o orłach legionowych z numerami pułków (http://pamiec.pl/pa/tylko-u-nas/14090,ORLY-LEGIONOW-POLSKICH-pierwsza-czesc-artykulu-Tomasza-Zawistowskiego.html, http://pamiec.pl/pa/tylko-u-nas/15338,ORLY-LEGIONOW-POLSKICH-druga-czesc-artykulu-Tomasza-Zawistowskiego.html, http://pamiec.pl/pa/tylko-u-nas/15340,ORLY-LEGIONOW-POLSKICH-trzecia-czesc-artykulu-Tomasza-Zawistowskiego.html). Wydaje mi się, że to raczej mogą być orły z okresu pierwszych lat niepodległości, albo z okresu istnienia Polskiego Korpusu Posiłkowego. W haśle pl:Polski orzeł wojskowy, można znaleźć informację, że w 1919 roku wprowadzono wzór z umieszczonym na tarczy amazonek numerem pułku lub nazwą broni, natomiast w artykule Muzeum JP (http://mjp.najlepszemedia.pl/odznaki-i-oznaki-legionow-polskich), że orły z numerem pułku wprowadzono w PKP w 1917 roku.

Pozdrawiam.

Korony pojawiały się wcześniej, początkowo w II Brygadzie (http://i1.imged.pl/orzelek-legionowy-z-korona-1917-r.jpg). Co do numerów dalej nie jestem przekonany. Tak, masz rację, że Królestwo Polskie utworzono pod koniec 1916 roku. Tylko, że już 20 września 1916 r. utworzono Polski Korpus Posiłkowy. Tak, więc mogło być tak, że podczas przeformowywania Legionów w PKP, pod koniec 1916 roku wprowadzano nowe orzełki wraz z nowym umundurowaniem (w grudniu utworzono komisję mundurową). --MAx 92 (talk) 21:24, 31 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dobrze nich Ci będzie. ;-) Znalazłem źródło mówiące o orzełkach z numerami pułków w Legionach Polskich. Ale wprowadzono je dopiero pod koniec istnienia formacji i nie wydaje mi się, żeby się zdążyły szeroko rozpowszechnić. Pozdrawiam. ;-) --MAx 92 (talk) 18:51, 4 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Polish Army capturing Zaolzie in 1938.PNG[edit]

File:Polish Army capturing Zaolzie in 1938.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Dd1495 (talk) 08:31, 25 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Soviet invasion on Poland 1939.jpg[edit]

File:Soviet invasion on Poland 1939.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Dd1495 (talk) 09:32, 25 September 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mapa województwa ruskiego (I RP)[edit]

Czy byłbyś w stanie zrobić mapkę województwa ruskiego (I RP), analogicznie jak innych województw? Na razie jest tylko wersja rosyjskojęzyczna (zob.). Poprawiałem wersje włoskie artykułów o województwach kresowych; linki u dołu strony i stwierdziłem ten brak. A może przy okazji możesz sprawdzić i uzupełnić, by był komplet map wszystkich województw? Pozdrawiam NoychoH (talk) 05:53, 5 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pale of Settlement[edit]

Please, can you make map Map_showing_the_percentage_of_Jews_in_the_Pale_of_Settlement_and_Congress_Poland,_The_Jewish_Encyclopedia_(1905).jpg correct again? Somebody made on September 24th 2017 on this map changes, which are not correct. Livonia and Courland were never part of Pale of Settlement. Congress Poland was also not part of Pale of Settlement. 193.40.142.254 12:22, 28 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pale of Settlement, again[edit]

Map Map_showing_the_percentage_of_Jews_in_the_Pale_of_Settlement_and_Congress_Poland,_The_Jewish_Encyclopedia_(1905).jpg was made incorrect again. Congress Poland was never part of Pale of Settlement. But unfortunately some users as for example Claude Zygiel can not understand this. 193.40.142.254 12:37, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mapa Polski[edit]

Gdańsk akurat należał do I RP i nie był w II RP – i taki powinien być opis, poprawię w wolnej chwili, dzięki za znalezienie tej gafy. Pozdrawiam Ventic (talk) 19:11, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Bitwa pod Oliwą 1627 3.JPG[edit]

File:Bitwa pod Oliwą 1627 3.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 22:41, 13 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Polish Voluntary II Death Squad in Lviv 1920.PNG[edit]

File:Polish Voluntary II Death Squad in Lviv 1920.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Kekator (talk) 04:40, 17 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Polish Pig trained in Paris, Russian propaganda poster 1920.PNG

Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 07:42, 18 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:K.V.Nesselrode by Egor Botman after Kruger (mid. 19 c., Hermitage).png[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Incnis Mrsi (talk) 08:33, 22 August 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pale of Settlement, again and again[edit]

They spoiled Map showing the percentage of Jews in the Pale of Settlement and Congress Poland, The Jewish Encyclopedia (1905).jpg again. Congress-Poland was never part of Pale of Settlement. Velirand (talk) 13:21, 1 September 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Religions in Poland 1573[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Gvinder (talk) 10:09, 9 October 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What is your sources for File:Religions in Poland 1573.PNG and File:Religions in Poland 1750.PNG? Why Galicja and Wołyń have catholic majority? --Shmurak (talk) 16:18, 16 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Fijałkowski.JPG[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Cyfrowabiblioteka ([[User talk:Cyfrowabiblioteka|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:26, 18 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:26, 7 May 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Karol Ruprecht.PNG[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Cyfrowabiblioteka ([[User talk:Cyfrowabiblioteka|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:47, 2 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Salt Riot Nekrasov.jpg[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Facenapalm ([[User talk:Facenapalm|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:10, 6 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:40 ducats of Sigismund III Vasa from 1621 clear BG.png[edit]

Hello, I have proposed your picture of 40 ducats of Sigismund III for Q.I. image after some small modifications. Very good image and perfect quality. Sincerly yours, - Siren-Com ([[User talk:Siren-Com|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:09, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Wladislaus II Jagiello of Poland.PNG[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Michał Sobkowski ([[User talk:Michał Sobkowski|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:03, 3 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Template:Autotranslate[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Nominated for deletion by Template:Noping. I am a computer program; please do not ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot ([[User talk:Deletion Notification Bot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:14, 24 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Deletion Notification Bot/SDEL

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Template:Noping.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot ([[User talk:Deletion Notification Bot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:40, 30 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Armoiries Charles Robert Hongrie.png[edit]

Template:Autotranslate Glorious 93 ([[User talk:Glorious 93|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:06, 21 May 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]