User talk:Matthew T Rader

Quality Image Notifications
Valued Image Notifications

Commons:Photo challenge/2022 - October - Skyscrapers/Winners[edit]

	Photo Challenge Winner
	Congratulations! Your picture Miami skyline from the ocean.jpg won the 1st place in the Photo Challenge Skyscrapers, in October 2022. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 03:06, 15 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

COM:AN[edit]

বাংলা ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators noticeboard#Graywalls vs. Matthew T Rader. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

De728631 (talk) 00:57, 6 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Archived location of the discussion: Administrators Archive 79, Graywalls vs. Matthew T Rader
Copyright issues were resolved at the Commons Help Desk here: User account with copyright issues. Most of their pictures are sourced from their web page that asserts copyright notice while they're posted as creative commons here

File:Cloudless Sulfur Caterpillar (Phoebis sennae) eating Yellow Jessamine Flowers.jpg[edit]

File:Cloudless Sulfur Caterpillar (Phoebis sennae) eating Yellow Jessamine Flowers.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 09:59, 10 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Cumulonimbus calvus cloud over the Gulf of Mexico in Galveston, Texas.jpg[edit]

Hi, Matthew. IMHO this photo shows Cumulonimbus capillatus cloud, not Cumulonimbus calvus. The cloud contains a sort of developing fibrous „plume“ at the apex rather than a “whitish mass” without fibrous or striated parts. You can compare Cumulonimbus calvus vs Cumulonimbus capillatus in WMO International Cloud Atlas. Greetings Logi Aer (talk) 21:36, 17 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I did some more research on Cumulonimbus capillatus vs Cumulonimbus calvus, though I do agree it looks a lot like a capillatus but I still think it's a calvus. According to other places where I read about the clouds, such as https://whatsthiscloud.com/cloud-types/cumulonimbus and https://meteorologytraining.tpub.com/14269/css/14269_24.htm the capillatus has a flattened and or hairy top, whereas the calvus has the puffy top which I believe the cloud in my photo has. I am open to input from more people to see what they think as well. Matthew T Rader (talk) 14:32, 19 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The boundaries between cloud species are fairly fluid, so when dealing with a transitional form the distinction can be difficult and leaves some room for interpretation. It's certain that this is Cumulonimbus. Nevertheless, I personally feel that this is not a typical calvus, and therefore I would not place this photo as representative of this species. Agree that it would be nice if someone else would rate it. Logi Aer (talk) 20:40, 25 July 2021 (UTC))Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ eesti ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ français ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ English ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Virtual Photography from Assassin's Creed Valhalla 177.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, TFerenczy (talk) 23:12, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]